Article appeared in The Daily Telegraph

Budapest
Data courtesy of Global Property Guide
20. Paris, France
Good: Low rental costs, high yields in Paris, Global political powerhouse
Bad: pro-tenant rental market, moderate-to-high transaction costs
19. Helsinki, Finland
Good: low to moderate transaction costs, strong economy, moderate yields, tenant-neutral rental market
Bad: high rental income tax.
18. Prague, Czech Republic
Good: pro-landlord rental market. Moderate yields, low transaction costs
Bad: moderate to high rental income tax. Aliens can’t buy land directly
17. Sophia, Bulgaria
Good: pro-landlord rental market
Bad: yields not great, high transaction costs, moderate rental income tax, corruption and crime problems
16. Brussels, Belgium
Good: strong rental demand
Bad: moderate to high transaction costs, tiresome tenancy length limits, moderate to high taxes
15. Vienna, Austria
Good: stable political system, moderate transaction costs, moderate yields for new units
Bad: complicated pro-tenant system, moderate to high rental income taxes
14. Ljubljana, Slovenia
Good: Pro-landlord rental market, low transaction costs, strong post-transition economy
Bad: low to moderate yields in Ljublana, high rental income tax, minor issues with ownership
13. Bratislava, Slovakia
Good: Low to moderate rental income tax, very low transaction costs, tenant-neutral rental market
Bad: minor issues with property rights, low rental yields.
12 Bucharest, Romania
Good: low transaction costs, strong post-transition economy
Bad: low to moderate rental yields, high rental income tax, strong pro-tenant sentiments
11. Warsaw, Poland
Good: low transaction costs, strong post-transition economy
Bad: low to moderate rental yields, high rental income tax, strong pro-tenant sentiments
10. Chisinau, Moldova
Good: High yields, pro-landlord rental market
Bad: secessionist problems, high tax rates, purchases must be in cash, one of poorest economies in Europe
9. Riga, Latvia
Good: pro-landlord rental market, low effective rental income tax rates, low transaction costs, high GDP growth, recent correction in housing market has restored value
Bad: low to moderate yields, minor ownership restrictions on land
8. Rome, Italy
Good: Europe’s historical centre, strong tourist rental market
Bad: strongly pro-tenant laws, high round-trip transaction costs, high income taxes
7. Berlin, Germany
Good: low to moderate transaction costs, largest economy in Europe, high yields in Berlin
Bad: pro-tenant rental market, moderate rental income tax
6. Talinn, Estonia
Good: very low transaction costs, moderate yields in Tallinn, strong economic growth
Bad: high rental income tax, slightly pro-tenant market
5. Zagreb, Croatia
Good: Strong tourist rental market, moderate taxes
Bad: multiple foreign ownership limits, moderate to high transaction costs, vulnerable and unstable economy
4. Istanbul, Turkey
Good: Moderate costs, moderate to high yields, rapid economic growth, low-to moderate transaction costs
Bad: pro-tenant rental market, moderate to high income taxes
3. Amsterdam, Netherlands
Good: moderate yields in Amsterdam, strong economy, moderate transaction costs, moderate rental income taxes
Bad: pro-tenant rental market
2. Skopje, Macedonia
Good: high yields, pro-landlord rental market, low transaction costs, moderate income taxes
Bad: serious ownership restrictions, political and security concerns
1. Budapest, Hungary
Good yields, low to moderate transaction costs, pro-landlord law
Bad: minor ownership restrictions, moderate to high rental income taxes